IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
DR. SHYLA – Appellant
Versus
DR. JALEEL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J When these appeals came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the disputes between the parties have been settled in the mediation held under the aegis of Mediation Centre, Ernakulam and a memorandum of agreement has been filed before this Court.
2. We have examined the memorandum of agreement and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the agreement are lawful and therefore the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, Mat.Appeal No.844/2024 is dismissed as withdrawn and Mat.A Nos.790/2024 and 845/2024 are disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at by the parties.
4. The memorandum of agreement entered into between the parties do form part of this judgment.
The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the memorandum of agreement .
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE Sd/-
M.B.SNEHALATHA, JUDGE Mms BREORE TRE HottouRABLE mGH OormT OF EmALA AT ENARTRA fu. sbfro Appeflant V8, Dr. Jaleel Respondents UHDER sEonoH 89 OF rm CODE OF clVIL pROcEDURE READ wlTH Rul;rs 24 & 25 oF THE crvlL pRocBDUR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.