SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
RAMESH V.N. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOSEPH M.P.
For the Respondents: SRI SANAL P. RAJ

ORDER

The petitioner is the 2nd accused in CC No.368/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkancherry. The allegation against him is that he, along with his minor son, criminally trespassed into the courtyard of the residence of CW2, and inflicted voluntary hurt upon her by hitting with a broom. There is also an allegation that the petitioner and his minor son uttered abusive words. Accordingly, the Final Report has been filed by the Chelakkara Police alleging commission of the offences under Sections 447 , 324 and 294(b) IPC read with Section 34 .

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the offences under Sections 324 and 294(b) are prima facie not attracted in the facts and circumstances of the case. As regards the offence under Section 447 IPC , it is submitted that a false allegation has been raised against the petitioner and his son. The learned counsel would also submit that the petitioner is a handicapped person who is unable to commit any of the offences as alleged.

4. It appears that the offence under Section 32

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top