SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3495

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SIRAJ MATHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5786 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY, SRI.E.S.SANEEJ, SRI.M.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, SMT.M.K.SAMYUKTHA, SRI.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.DEEPU RAJAGOPAL
For the Respondents: SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR, SHRI.K.A.JALEEL, SRI.P.MOHAMMED ANZARI, SRI SUDHEER G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Withdrawal of a criminal petition permits future challenges against final reports, safeguarding legal remedies.

Headnote:The case involves a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Crl.M.C NO. 5786 OF 2020 regarding a complaint against the petitioner. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition to retain the option for future action against the Final Report. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition. The pivotal legal question discerned was whether the petitioner's request for withdrawal necessitated the court's consideration. Upon thorough review, the court upheld the request, emphasizing the right to challenge future reports as critical in maintaining judicial recourse.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C, leaving open the option to challenge the Final Report filed in this case.

Permission granted.

The Crl.M.C stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top