SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3495

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SIRAJ MATHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY, SRI.E.S.SANEEJ, SRI.M.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, SMT.M.K.SAMYUKTHA, SRI.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.DEEPU RAJAGOPAL
For the Respondents: SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR, SHRI.K.A.JALEEL, SRI.P.MOHAMMED ANZARI, SRI SUDHEER G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C, leaving open the option to challenge the Final Report filed in this case.

Permission granted.

The Crl.M.C stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top