Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
SUDHEER RAM S – Appellant
Versus
SRI. BIJU PRABHAKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt case initiated by petitioners. (Para 1) |
| 2. challenge to pay scale adjustment. (Para 2) |
| 3. prior contempt case judgments discussed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. new orders by respondents not compliant. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. legal argument from petitioner's counsel. (Para 7) |
| 6. respondents' position on compliance. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. scope of enquiry limited to compliance. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. legal findings on pay adjustment. (Para 12) |
| 9. contempt case dismissed with leave to challenge. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
1. This Contempt Case is filed by Petitioner Nos.1 to 7, 10, 11 and 13 to 19 in W.P.(C) No.11021 of 2016, which was disposed of by this Court as per Annexure I judgment dated 11.08.2022.
3. The Petitioners had filed Con.Case(C) No.867/2023 before this Hon'ble Court earlier, and thereupon, the Respondent No.2 passed an Order dated 31.03.2023 rejecting the claim of the Petitioners. Con.Case(C) No.867/2023 was disposed of by this Court as per Annexure III judgment dated 19.06.2023, holding that the Order dated 31.03.2023 does not appear to be in adherence to the spirit or tenor of the Annexure I judgment and closing the Contempt Case recording the submission of the learned Counsel for the Resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
