Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHEREENA SHAMSU – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writ to seek relief under the kerala act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments heard from both sides regarding the application. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directed necessary actions on the application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2 (xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit.P3 Application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.
(ii) Allow the Writ petition with costs."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 2 7A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
