IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHEREENA SHAMSU – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2 (xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit.P3 Application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.
(ii) Allow the Writ petition with costs."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 2 7A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.