SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3528

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHEREENA SHAMSU – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2736 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFFI
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court emphasized the importance of timely consideration of applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, establishing a framework for compliance.

Headnote:This Writ Petition is filed seeking relief under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 regarding Ext.P3 application. The Court directed the 3rd respondent to submit a necessary report and the 2nd respondent to consider the application based on the report expeditiously. The judgments and timelines set forth are to ensure compliance under the law.

Table of Content
1. filing of writ to seek relief under the kerala act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments heard from both sides regarding the application. (Para 3)
3. court directed necessary actions on the application. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" (i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2 (xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit.P3 Application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.

(ii) Allow the Writ petition with costs."

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 2 7A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SSG

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 27.01.2026
Judgment dictated 27.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 27.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 28.01.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2736 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED

21-05-2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit- P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top