IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
GRACY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2879 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. expedited review of land application (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial directive on administrative responsibility (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i. To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to call for all records in pursuant to the Ext.P1 and Ext.P3 records if just, proper and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.
ii. To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to consider and pass orders on Form-5 application under Ext.P3 submitted by the petitioner and remove the property of the petitioner covered in Ext P1 sale deed from the Data bank Register as expeditiously within a time frame fixed by this Hon’bel Court.
iii. To issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on application submitted by the petitioner under Ext.P3 after making the physical verification of the land and remove the land from data bank as expeditiously within a time frame fixed by this Hon’bel Court.
iv. Allow the Writ petition with costs."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.