Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSEPH JOHN DECRUZE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel requests for timely direction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court issues directions for expeditious handling. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" 1. Call for the entire records pertaining to the facts pleaded in the Writ Petition (Civil).
2. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, any other Order, writ or direction, directing the 4th Respondent to pass final orders on the Form 5 applications filed by the petitioner covered in Exhibit-P3 within a time fixed by this Hon’ble Court."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
