SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3533

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSEPH JOHN DECRUZE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2969 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MEREENA.J.JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Court can mandate timely consideration of applications submitted to authorities under relevant statutes.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th Respondent to pass final orders on the Form 5 applications, citing the need for timely consideration. The court found merit in the petition and decided to issue directions for prompt reporting and decision-making. The court ordered that the report be submitted within one month and the application considered within two months.

Result: The petition is disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel requests for timely direction. (Para 3)
3. court issues directions for expeditious handling. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" 1. Call for the entire records pertaining to the facts pleaded in the Writ Petition (Civil).

2. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, any other Order, writ or direction, directing the 4th Respondent to pass final orders on the Form 5 applications filed by the petitioner covered in Exhibit-P3 within a time fixed by this Hon’ble Court."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 4th respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 4th respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 4th and 5th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SSG

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 27.01.2026
Judgment dictated 27.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 27.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 28.01.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2969 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY SURVEY NO.336/2-32 OF ANGAMALLY VILLAGE DATED

11/7/2025 Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE DATA BANK IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY COVERED IN BLOCK-11, SURVEY NO. 336/2-32 AND ITS SUB DIVISIONS OF ANGAMALLY VILLAGE PUBLISHED IN KERALA GAZETTE DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top