Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
VINU VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
MANIKANDAN R. – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO.3114 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.4653 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL, SRI.S.SREEDEV, SRI.RONY JOSE, SHRI.LEO LUKOSE, SRI.KAROL MATHEWS SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, SHRI.DERICK MATHAI, SRI.KARAN SCARIA ABRAHAM, SRI.RINOY INNOCENT, SRI.AADITHYA S.R.
For the Respondents: GP- NIMA JACOB

The court is satisfied with compliance of earlier directions, thus closing the contempt case.

Headnote:The court examines the compliance of the directions issued in WP

(C) No.4653 of 2021. The petitioner asserts that the directions from the prior judgment have not been fulfilled. The court finds satisfaction in the counsel's assertion that compliance has occurred, leading to the closure of the contempt case.

Result: This contempt case is closed.

JUDGMENT

The learned Standing Counsel submits that the directions in the judgment dated 16.01.2025 in WP(C) No.4653 of 2021 have been complied with.

Recording the aforesaid submission, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JVINU VARGHESE – AppellantVersusMANIKANDAN R. – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO.3114 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.4653 OF 2021

The court is satisfied with compliance of earlier directions, thus closing the contempt case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
VINU VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
MANIKANDAN R. – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO.3114 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.4653 OF 2021