SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
VALSAMMA GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KOTTAYAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.M.JOSEPH, SRI.SIJI ANTONY, SRI.R.S.HARI KUMAR
For the Respondents: JUSTINE JACOB, T.NAVEEN SC, PCB, K.J.SAJI ISAAC, DR.ELIZABETH VARKEY, JITHIN SAJI ISAAC, K.S.ARUN KUMAR, RAJEE P MATHEWS, NIMA JACOB, GP

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that no grievance subsists as on date, since the 9th respondent has already closed down the fish stall.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is closed, leaving open the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again, if any grievance arise in future.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top