JUDGMENT

These appeals are preferred by the plaintiff who is also the counterclaim defendant in a suit for injunction. The appellant herein/plaintiff, along with his wife possessed 19 cents of land, which they derived by a sale deed in year 1996. The defendants 1 & 2, who are the neighboring owners, had entered into an arrangement with the plaintiff by which the plaintiff had set apart a pathway having a length of 135 links with a width of 7 links in the east and 8 links in the west. The plaintiff contends that he had constructed a temporary fencing by leaving apart the pathway in question which was earmarked for the easement right of the defendants. Thus, it is contended that the defendants have a permissive right to access the pathway in question. But then, they are attempting to widen the pathway