Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NIDHA NISHA NAZIR MUSLIYAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request regarding property concern. (Para 2) |
| 2. hearing process for representation. (Para 3) |
| 3. direction for administrative action. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" i) Issue Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or Order directing the first respondent to consider Exhibit P4 representation submitted by the petitioner and dispose the same within such time to be decided by this Hon’ble Court."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer of the petitioner is to remove a bus waiting shed constructed abutting the property of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, this is constructed on the PWD property. Petitioner submitted Ext.P4 before the 1st respondent. The petitioner limits his prayer for consideration of Ext.P4. Hence, this Writ Petition.
3. Heard counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel appearing for the Municipality and also the Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, without expressing anything on merit, there can be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the Municipality.
Therefore, this Writ Petition (C) is disposed of with the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
