SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3929

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
IRSHAD – Appellant
Versus
SHAMEEMA – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 10 OF 2026 | OP(Money) NO.646 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.SASITH

The court has emphasized the need for timely resolutions in family court cases, supporting applications for expediting proceedings.

Headnote:The petitioners sought expedited proceedings for OP(Money) 646/2021 pending in the Family Court. The Court noted the delays and directed the Family Court to decide on the application without unnecessary delay referencing Shiju Joy A. v. Nisha. Ultimately, the application was to be acted upon within one month from receipt of this judgment.

Table of Content
1. application for expedited proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court’s emphasis on timely resolutions. (Para 3 , 4)

Devan Ramachandran , J.

The petitioners seek that OP(Money) No.646/2021, pending before the learned Family Court, Chavara, be directed to be taken up and disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Sri.M.R.Sasith Panicker - appearing for the petitioners, submits that, though his clients have moved the learned Family Court seeking expeditious disposal of the Original Petition through an Interlocutory Application, produced as Ext.P2; the Family Court has not taken adequate steps to expedite the proceedings.

3. We certainly have empathy for the petitioners; and ideally, all cases should be disposed of at the earliest. However, there is a large pendency in every Family Court and we cannot be oblivious to this.

4. That said, Ext.P2 application moved by the petitioners before the learned Family Court - which, in our view, is in accordance with the declarations in Shiju Joy A. v. Nisha [2021 (2)

KLT 607] - requires to be disposed of without delay.

In the afore circumstances, we allow this Original Petition; with a direction to the learned Family Court, Chavara, to consider Ext.P2 application in its proper perspective, leading to appropriate orders/action on it, without any avoidable delay, but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE stu APPENDIX OF OP (FC) NO. 10 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN O.P (MONEY)NO. 646/2021 FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top