IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LLYAS M – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, TRIKKALANGODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief through writ. (Para 1) |
| 2. court reviews licensing and administrative conduct. (Para 2) |
| 3. importance of a hearing before revoking a license. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : 1. “Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash Ext.P10 and P11;
2. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents not to interfere with the quarrying operations of the petitioner;
3. To grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and fit in the circumstances of the case; And
4. To dispense with filing of the translation of documents in vernacular language;” [sic]
2. The petitioner has obtained a letter of intent as evident by Ext.P1 for conducting quarrying operation in an extent of 0.9809 hectares of land comprised under re-survey no.
403/5 of Elamkur Village, Ernad Taluk, Malappuram District. It is the case of the petitioner that he already obtained Environmental Clearance as evident by Ext.P4, consent to operate from the Pollution Control Board as evident by Ext.P7 and Explosive Licence as evident by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.