IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
K.BHAGIRATHI SHENOY W/O LATE K. GOKULDAS SHENOY – Appellant
Versus
KASARAGOD MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of private pathway rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on burden of proof. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observation on necessary parties. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final decision on appeal dismissed. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal arises out of the concurrent findings of the Principal Munsiff Court, Kasaragod, in O.S. No. 346/1999, a suit for a declaration that the pathway in question is a private pathway and does not belong to the public, as affirmed by the Subordinate Court, Kasaragod, in A.S. No. 62/2007.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
2.1. The plaintiffs claim that 9.74 acres of land originally belonged to them as per sale deed dated 03.09.1957. There existed a residential house and other buildings in the aforesaid property. A portion of the plaint A schedule property is claimed by late K.Narayana by way of agricultural tenancy. A private road branching from NH-17 passes through R.S.Nos.111/1A, 112/2 and 112/1 of Kasaragod Kasba Village. The said pathway is marked as ‘R’ in the eye sketch produced along with the plaint. A branch road from road ‘R’ is marked as ‘R1’ in the eye sketch. Thus the plaintiffs claimed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.