SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4027

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
VISHNU V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.V.DILEEP
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ) seeking pre- arrest bail in Crime No.1275/2024 of Karunagapally Police Station, Kollam District.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the applicant has not been arrayed as an accused so far in the above crime. In these circumstances, there is no basis for apprehension of arrest. However, there are specific allegations against the applicant in the FIS. The defacto complainant sustained injury in the incident. Hence, if the investigating officer during investigation finds that the applicant is involved in the crime and committed a cognizable offence specified in sub-section (1) of Section 35 of BNSS and forms an opinion that the arrest of the applicant is not required under sub-section (1) of , he shall issue notice to the applicant as contemplated under sub- section (3) of and the applicant shall comply the terms of the said notice.

With the above observations, the bail application stands dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top