Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMED FAIZAL K.C – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of misappropriation by accused (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims of innocence versus prosecution's arguments (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. unnecessary custodial interrogation of applicants (Para 6) |
ORDER
2. B.A. No.14602/2025 pertains to Crime No.761/2025, B.A. No.14603/2025 pertains to Crime No.762/2025, B.A. No.14618/2025 pertains to Crime No.763/2025, B.A. No.14621/2025 pertains to Crime No.764/2025, B.A. No.14622/2025 pertains to Crime No.765/2025 and B.A. No.14623/2025 pertains to Crime No.766/2025 of Chakkarakkal Police Station, Kannur District. The applicants are accused Nos.3 to 9 and 11 to 13 in all the cases. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 316 (2), 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’).
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants, the learned counsel for the defacto complainants and the learned Public Prosecutors. Perused the case diary.
6. As stated earlier, accused No.3 is the President and the remaining accused are the Directors of the society. The records would show that the Co-operative Department conducted an audit and found that accused Nos.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
