Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
PRINEESH.P.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment adjustments and transfer requests (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial compliance in postings (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial superintendence and limits of jurisdiction (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. reasoning for non-interference on factual grounds (Para 13) |
| 5. final mandate for petitioner’s posting (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.(EKM)No.1580 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal Additional Bench at Ernakulam (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioner is working as an L.D. Clerk (now redesignated as Clerk) in the Civil Supplies Department. The petitioner was included in the ranked list for L.D. Clerk of Thrissur District and was advised and appointed in Thrissur District. While so, the petitioner was deputed to Supplyco as per Annexure A3 order dated 22.03.2018 of the Government. Thereafter, on completion of the deputation period, there was no vacancy to a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
