Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN, SMT.JUBAIRIYA T.
For the Respondents: ADV. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR.GP

The court upheld the principle that a petitioner may withdraw from a writ petition leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:The court considered the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel regarding the intention to pursue the writ petition. Upon acknowledging this, the court dismissed the writ petition. The issues presented revolved around the petitioner’s withdrawal from the proceedings. The final decision stated: 'Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.'

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner does not intend to pursue the writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :