Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
KUNHABDULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner faces criminal charges linked to familial relationships. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. resolution of matrimonial disputes and settlements can impact ongoing legal issues. (Para 3 , 4 , 7) |
| 3. the court examined the nature of the alleged offence. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's rationale for allowing quashing based on resolution of disputes. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026)
The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.1056 of
2024 of Vadakara Police Station, Kozhikode. He filed this petition under Section 528 BNSS praying for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner. The offences alleged against the petitioner is under Section s 74 , 75(1)(i), 64 and 62 of BNS.
2. The prosecution case as revealed from the FIR is that, on 01.09.2024 at about 2.00 in the night, when the de facto complainant was sleeping in her bedroom, the accused, who is her father-in-law entered the room and attempted to commit rape upon her and thereby, he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the entire disputes between the parties were settled. Further, according to the learned counsel, this i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
