Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE, SHRI.SACHU THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI.P.T.MANOJ

Courts recognize the right of a petitioner to withdraw their application, allowing for dismissal without contest.

Headnote:This judgment involves the interpretation of procedural aspects related to the dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner submitted for withdrawal, and the Court recorded this. The primary finding was the procedural need for withdrawal without contest. The resultant is the dismissal of the Crl. M.C. as sought.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :