J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed this captioned writ petition pointing out that, though a vehicle owned by him was seized by the 1^st respondent on the basis of an alleged violation of the provisions of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules , 2015, the seizure as above was not reported before the 2^nd respondent, on account of which, the petitioner is not in a position to seek for release of the vehicle in question.

2. While admitting the writ petition on

05.09.2023, this Court had directed the 1^st respondent to report the seizure of the vehicle in question to the 2^nd respondent within three days and permitted the petitioner to approach the

2^nd respondent for release of vehicle in question.

In the light of the afore, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required in this writ petition. In such circumstances, this writ petition would stand disposed of in terms of the interim order dated 05.09.2023.

Sd/-