Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
V.S. Atheesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on dishonored cheque under negotiable instruments act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's arguments insufficient to counter complainant's evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. revisional court's standard for interference discussed. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. affirmation of lower court's decisions. (Para 8) |
| 5. grant of time for compliance with the court's order. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
The challenge in this Crl. Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 16.12.2025 in Crl.Appeal No.105 of 2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Court - I, Alappuzha, confirming the conviction and the sentence rendered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Alappuzha, in judgment dated 05.04.2024 in C.C.No.189 of 2021.
2. The revision petitioner is the sole accused. He has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the NI Act’) and sentenced undergo imprisonment till rising of the Court. He was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.4,00,000/-.
3. The complainant/respondent No.2 filed a complaint before the Trial Court alleging that the accused/revision petitioner executed Ext.P2 cheque for a sum of Rs.9,00,000/-. The complainant presented the cheque for encashment
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
