Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
PRADEEP M.N – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court recognized the matter as infructuous. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's dismissal of the petition. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
