Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PETER THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
MAHESWARI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek invocation of court's jurisdiction regarding delays in tribunal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. previous judgments acknowledged, further investigation desired. (Para 5) |
| 3. court insists on proceeding despite requests for delay, referencing finality of earlier decisions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
The original petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) To call for the records leading to the case;
(ii) To pass such orders or direction to keep in abeyance the further proceedings in OP (MV)1030/2022 on the files of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Ernakulam, till the completion of the further enquiry and submission of final report in FIR No. 876/2021 of Ambalamedu Police Station pursuant to Exhibit P3 Judgment;
(iii) To pass such other order as are deemed just fair and reasonable in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Earlier, the petitioners had approached this Court by filing OP(MAC) Nos.34/2025 and 51/2025. Crl. M.C No.8808/2022 was also filed to quash the final report in CC No. 466/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chottanikkara, arising from FIR 876/2021 of Ambalamedu Police Station registered under Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
