Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
AHAMMED KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges suitability for tower construction on sensitive land. (Para 1) |
| 2. court rules the matter is moot as project dropped. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring that the land covered by Ext.P2 application being a sensitive zone and environmentally fragile land on the river shore, the same is not suitable for construction of the telecommunication tower.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the respondents 1 and 2 not rely on Ext.P5 report of the Tahsildar, Eranad while taking a decision on the request of the 5th respondent for erecting telecommunication tower.
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the respondents 1 to 4 not to grant permission for erecting a mobile telecommunication tower on the Kadalundy River shore unless and until the feasibility of the same is studied by a competent authority/agency.
(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction commanding the respondents 1 to 4 to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
