SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
AMAL RAVINDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46782 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN, SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH
For the Respondents: SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN

The validity of rank lists must be observed, as expired lists preclude necessary inclusion.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the rejection of his candidature by the Kerala State Public Service Commission, seeking inclusion in a rank list. The Commission stated the list's validity expired on 08.12.2025. The Court dismissed the petition, finding no grounds for relief. The key issue was the expiration of the rank list. The Court upheld the Commission's position, confirming that relief could not be granted. The writ petition is hence dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks inclusion in expired rank list. (Para 1)
2. commission confirmed validity expired. (Para 2)
3. writ petition dismissed. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who is working as a Peon in a Primary Co-operative Society, has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-

“i. Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writs, to quash the intimation published in the website of the 1st respondent rejecting the case of the petitioner as evident from Ext.P10;

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the 1st respondent to appropriately include the petitioner in the rank list published pursuant to Ext.P2 notification and issue necessary advice in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice;

iii. Issue a writ to declare that the rejection of the case of the petitioner by the 1st respondent is illegal, irregular and arbitrary.”

2. Standing Counsel representing the 1st respondent submits that the validity of the ranklist has expired on

08.12.2025.

3. In view of the afore development, no reliefs claimed for by the petitioner can be granted at this stage.

The writ petition is hence dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top