SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSE JACOB – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RAJEENA S – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV SHRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, both sides submitted that, the directions have already been complied with. If that is the case, contempt case can be closed.

Therefore, the contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top