IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MATHEW VIBEN T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate Writs or Orders commanding the 3rd Respondent to immediately consider Exhibit.P2 application of the Petitioners, and to issue directions for the removal and rectification of erroneous entries from Data Bank with respect to 3.72 Ares of property, comprised in Survey. No 99/7-2 of Mulavukad Village, Ernakulam District, within a short period fixed by this Hon’ble Court."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioners under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 6th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.