SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
Yasar – Appellant
Versus
The Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institution – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. Issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing the Exhibit P8 and Exhibit P9 order issued by 1st respondent.

ii. Issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing the Exhibit P10 issued by 2nd respondent.

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus , or any other appropriate writ, order, or directing the 1st respondent to pass fresh order on Exhibit P1 file by the 3rd respondent after consider the objection of the petitioner filed as per the Exhibit P5 and affording the opportunity of hearing the petitioner.

iv. To grant such other and incidental reliefs as this Hon’ble court may deem fit, just and necessary in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case (SIC)

2. This Writ Petition is filed challenging Ext.P9.

Admittedly Ext.P9 is a final order in accordance with Section 235 (w) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act . It is also an admitted fact that it is an appealable order. In such circumstances this Court cannot entertain this writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a breathing time may be given.

3. Considering the facts and circumstan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top