IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BABY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P4 and quash the condition in Ext.P4 that “the petitioner shall not make any construction in the said property and shall do only the agricultural works in the property”.
ii. Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P8 and quash the same by issuing a writ of Certiorari and direct the 2nd Respondent to reconsider the Form 6 application, within a timeframe fixed by this Hon’ble court.
iii. Dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition as Ext.P1 to Ext.P6 and Ext.P8.
iv. Pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case.
v. Allow the writ petition writ petition with cost.
(SIC)
2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to quash the condition in Ext.P4 that the petitioner shall not make any construction in the said property and shall do only the agricultural works in the property. The petitioner also challenged Ext.P8 order passed in a Form-6 application. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.