SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
HARIDAS – Appellant
Versus
RENJINI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN, SMT.DEEPA K.RADHAKRISHNAN, SRI.VISHAK K.V., SMT.ANUSREE P.A.
For the Respondents: SRI.P.M.RAFIQ, SRI.AJIT THOMAS

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up today, it is submitted that the original petition has become infructuous.

The original petition is dismissed as infructuous without prejudice to the contentions of the parties in O.P.(C)

No.3078 of 2025.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE mpm APPENDIX OF OP(C) NO. 2291 OF 2025 PETITIONERS’ EXHIBITS Exhibit P1. A TRUE COPY OF PLAINT IN O.S.NO. 5/2025 DATED 04.01.2025 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, THRISSUR.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top