SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4205

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
JAMEENUDHEEN.A. – Appellant
Versus
KHADEEJA – Respondent
Tr.P(C) NO. 239 OF 2025 | OP NO.2713 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN, SRI.K.S.RAJESH, SRI.M.K.FAISAL, SMT.SINDHU K.S.

A Transfer Petition can be dismissed if the petitioner indicates that they are not pursuing it.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the dismissal of a Transfer Petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, initiated by the petitioner for transfer due to jurisdiction concerns. The court acknowledges the petitioner’s statement of not pursuing the matter further. It concludes that the Transfer Petition is dismissed as not pressed based on the petitioner’s counsel's submission.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing this Tr.P(C). The submission is recorded.

Accordingly, the Tr.P(C) is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top