Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ASHKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed under bnss. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on legality of arrest and bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal standards for communicating grounds of arrest. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 4. communication of contraband quantity is mandatory. (Para 12) |
| 5. conditions of bail stipulated. (Para 14) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.294/2025 of Nemom Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 22 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on
02.03.2025 at 12:20 hours, the accused No.1 was found in possession of 71.32 grams of MDMA in a Tamil Nadu SRTC bus bearing registration No. TN-74-N-2094 near Pravachambalam junction and thereby committed the offence.
4. I have heard Sri.K.Mohammed Rafeeq, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the requi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
