SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SMT. SMITHA P R – Appellant
Versus
SMT. CHINCHU LIZEN BABU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.GANESH
For the Respondents: SMT. NISHA BOSE, SR. GP

Anil K. Narendran, J.

This writ appeal arises out of the judgment dated

06.01.2026 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No.2704 of 2024. The appellant is the 5th respondent in W.P.(C)No.2704 of

2024.

2. Today, when this writ appeal came up for admission, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that certain mistakes have crept in while drafting the writ appeal. Therefore, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the writ appeal, without prejudice to her right to file a fresh writ appeal, with proper pleadings.

Based on the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the aforesaid right of the appellant. Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top