IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SMT. SMITHA P R – Appellant
Versus
SMT. CHINCHU LIZEN BABU – Respondent
Anil K. Narendran, J.
This writ appeal arises out of the judgment dated
06.01.2026 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)No.2704 of 2024. The appellant is the 5th respondent in W.P.(C)No.2704 of
2024.
2. Today, when this writ appeal came up for admission, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that certain mistakes have crept in while drafting the writ appeal. Therefore, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the writ appeal, without prejudice to her right to file a fresh writ appeal, with proper pleadings.
Based on the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the aforesaid right of the appellant. Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE Sd/-
MURALEE KRISHNA S., JUDGE MIN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.