Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOHNSON JOHN, J
RAHUL RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused convicted for causing death by negligent driving. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments from both sides on evidence and guilt. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court can only review for glaring errors, not re-evaluate evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. confirmed dismissal of revision petition. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This revision petition is filed against the judgment in Crl. Appeal
264 of 2018 of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Muvattupuzha. The revision petitioner is the accused and as per the impugned judgment, the appellate court confirmed the conviction and sentence against the revision petitioner for the offences under Sections 279 , 304A of IPC and Section 3 (1) r/w 181 and 146 r/w 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act .
2. As per the prosecution case, on 10.08.2014 at 7.30 p.m., the motorcycle ridden by the accused in a rash and negligent manner caused to hit the wife of PW2 and on 11.08.2014, she succumbed to her injuries while undergoing treatment in the hospital.
3. For the offence under Section 304A of IPC , the accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
