Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOHNSON JOHN, J
JAYAKUMAR.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and charges against the director. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense argument concerning resignation and liability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's affirmation of trial court's findings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling of dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the 7th accused in C.C No. 3743 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Thrissur and he is challenging the order dated 21.08.2020 in Crl.M.P. No. 3740 of 2020, whereby the trial court dismissed his application seeking discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C.
2. The accused persons, 9 in number, were charge-sheeted by the Sub Inspector of Police, Mannuthy Police Station for the offence under Section 420 r/w 149 IPC and Section 3 r/w 17 of the Money Lenders Act and r/w 9 of the Kerala Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act , 2012.
3. As per the prosecution case, the revision petitioner is one among the 8 Directors of the Golden Valley Chits (India) Ltd., a registered financial company, and the company obtained 128 signed blank cheques as security from various subscribers of the chitty conducted by the company without obtaining the licence requir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
