SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
P.G.ABHILASH – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY APPELLATE AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1356 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.SUNIL
For the Respondents: SRI. B. PREMOD

Court recognizes statutory appeal as a remedy against assessment order under Electricity Act.

Headnote:This writ petition challenges Ext.P10 final assessment order under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, alleging tariff misuse. The court observed that the petitioner has a statutory remedy against the order and directed the Appellate Authority to hear the appeal and pass orders within three months. The writ petition is disposed of as per the court's directive.

Table of Content
1. challenge to final assessment order under the electricity act. (Para 1)
2. court's direction for statutory appeal and consideration. (Para 2)
3. disposal of writ petition with instructions to appellate authority. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges Ext.P10 final assessment order passed under Section 126 of the Electricity Act .

2. This Court had passed the following order on 13.01.206:

“The petitioner challenges Ext.P10 final order issued by the Kerala State Electricity Board under Section 126 of the Electricity Act alleging tariff misuse.

2. The petitioner has an effective statutory remedy against Ext.P10 order. The petitioner may file an appeal against the same under Section 127 of the Act raising all available contentions. To enable the petitioner to avail of the same, all coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P10 shall stand deferred for a period of two weeks.

3. If the petitioner prefers an appeal within ten days' from today, the appellate authority shall consider the same on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as the petitioner submits that he received the order only on

07.01.2026 through e-mail as seen from Ext.P10.”

3. Pursuant to the above, the petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal by depositing 50% of the demand, as seen from Exts.P11 and P12. Taking note of the fact that, the petitioner had already file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act , there will be a direction to the 1st respondent – Appellate Authority to hear both sides and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say, till orders are passed in the appeal, no further coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top