SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
E K ASHRAF – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3367 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU

The court mandates prompt administrative action on revision applications concerning vehicle timings, ensuring due process.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the revision of vehicle timings under statutory provisions. The petitioner seeks the court's intervention for expedited disposal of his application. The court finds merit in the plea and mandates that the respondent must conclude the review process within two months. The court ultimately disposes of the writ petition directing the competent authority accordingly.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 9TH MAGHA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 3367 OF 2026 PETITIONER: E K ASHRAF, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O KOYAMOYTHEEN, 9/281, EDAVANKATTIL, CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673616 BY ADV SHRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT:

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-678002 SRI. P.S. APPU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

-------------------------------------------------

W.P.(C) No. 3367 of 2026 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking an expeditious disposal of Ext.P1 application filed by the petitioner for revision of his own timings concerning the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-59/D-5999.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that there is no objection to a direction being issued to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with the law and after hearing all affected parties, within two months.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having regard to the limited nature of relief sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent/competent authority to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with the law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all affected parties, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE bpr APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3367 OF 2026 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT FOR REVISION OF OWN TIMINGS ON THE ROUTE NARANGATHODE – KOZHIKODE VIA KODENCHERY, KOODATHAI, MAIKKAVE, THAMAARASSERY PALATH, AND KOKKODI IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL 59 / D 5999 DATED 26/7/25

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top