SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4295

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
C.P. PAULOSE – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM, SHRI.LAL K.JOSEPH, SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA
For the Respondents: ARUNKUMAR A., SC, KSEB, SRI. B. PREMOD, SC

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

“i.issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Ext-

P 7 demand/disconnection notice issued by the 3rd respondent.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents No 3 not to disconnect the power supply to the petitioner, without re-computing the demands, if any, in the light of the directions contained in Ext-

P4, P5 and P6 judgments.”

2. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire liability to the Board has been settled by making payment under the One Time Settlement Scheme. This is conceded by the learned Standing Counsel for the Board.

In view of the above, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top