IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ANEESH GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 representation before the 3rd respondent, requesting permanent registration of the vehicle purchased by him.
2. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P8 is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to pass orders in Ext.P8, in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.