SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ANEESH GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ, SHRI.ANANDHU SUBRAHMANIYAN, SHRI.LINS VARUGHESE THOMAS, SHRI.ADITHYA RAJU, SRI.SANJAY JOHNSON, SMT.KAVYA KRISHNA, SHRI.SANJITH JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SRI.C.R.SANISH, SMT.ANJANA K.P., SRI.KARTHIK S. ACHARYA, SHRI.ANISH MON K.T., SMT. DEVI, SHRI R., GP.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 representation before the 3rd respondent, requesting permanent registration of the vehicle purchased by him.

2. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P8 is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to pass orders in Ext.P8, in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top