Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
FAHAD.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests passport renewal despite criminal charge. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs timely decision on the application. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for renewal/re-issuance of the passport, notwithstanding the pendency of Crime No.363/2019 of Hemambika Police Station, Palakkad.
2. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the application is pending consideration.
3. Taking note of the above, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However, he shall leave the country only after getting permission from the court concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
