SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
FAHAD.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.K.SANDEEP, SMT.RESHMA VISWANATHAN
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, SRI. P.S. APPU

JUDGMENT

The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for renewal/re-issuance of the passport, notwithstanding the pendency of Crime No.363/2019 of Hemambika Police Station, Palakkad.

2. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the application is pending consideration.

3. Taking note of the above, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However, he shall leave the country only after getting permission from the court concerned.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top