Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THYKOODAM EDAVAKA CHRISTEEYA SANGAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for application consideration under land conservation laws. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both sides regarding application process. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs timely processing of the application as per law. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the Respondents No-2 to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P2 application under form 6 of the Kerala Conservation of paddy Land and Wet Land Rules, 2015 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
II. Permit the petitioner with dispensing with filling of the translation of Exhibit-P1 and Exhibit-P2 vernacular documents produced herewith. &
III. To pass any other order as this Hon’ble Court deems fit."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
