Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BABY VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of writ petition and applications under the act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's authority and hearing clarifications (Para 3) |
| 3. court orders and directives for compliance (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing second respondent to consider Exhibit P6 application and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period as may be specified by this Hon’ble Court.
b) Pass an order dispensing with production of English translated copy of exhibits produced along with this writ petition for the admission purpose of the matter and time may be granted for production of translated copies.
c) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
