SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4305

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BABY VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3405 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.DILIP, JIJO JOSEPH, AKHIL CHANDRAN
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court established procedural timelines for considering applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

Headnote:This Writ Petition seeks an order to consider the Ext.P6 application filed under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008, with specific requests for relief. The Court has ordered the 3rd respondent to submit a report within one month, and the 2nd respondent to consider the application based on this report within four months. The determination follows a complete review of the stipulated procedural requirements outlined in the relevant Act.

Table of Content
1. nature of writ petition and applications under the act (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's authority and hearing clarifications (Para 3)
3. court orders and directives for compliance (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing second respondent to consider Exhibit P6 application and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period as may be specified by this Hon’ble Court.

b) Pass an order dispensing with production of English translated copy of exhibits produced along with this writ petition for the admission purpose of the matter and time may be granted for production of translated copies.

c) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time."

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P6 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider the Ext.P6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 29.01.2026
Judgment dictated 29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 29.01.2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF SETTLEMENT DEED NO

7682/2011 OF S.R.O, KOTHAMANGALAM DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top