IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BABY VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3405 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of writ petition and applications under the act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's authority and hearing clarifications (Para 3) |
| 3. court orders and directives for compliance (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing second respondent to consider Exhibit P6 application and pass orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period as may be specified by this Hon’ble Court.
b) Pass an order dispensing with production of English translated copy of exhibits produced along with this writ petition for the admission purpose of the matter and time may be granted for production of translated copies.
c) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time."
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P6 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P6 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider the Ext.P6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF SETTLEMENT DEED NO
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
29.01.2026
7682/2011 OF S.R.O, KOTHAMANGALAM DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.