IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PETER JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3427 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed seeking direction for application consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner satisfied with a timely consideration direction. (Para 2) |
| 3. court hears both sides and finds merit in issuing directions. (Para 3) |
| 4. court directs report submission and application consideration timelines. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent or the Authorized officer under Section 2 (xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P2 application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.
(ii) To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents. (iii) Allow the Writ petition with costs.
(iv) Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 2nd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 2nd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider Ext. P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2nd and 4th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 13.05.2024 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
29.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
29.01.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.