IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
Mumthaz – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Collector (RR) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"a) a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 1st respondent to expedite the proceedings in Ext.P2 and pass appropriate orders within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, b) a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction directing the 2nd respondent to submit necessary reports to the 1st respondent pertaining to Ext.P2 application of the petitioner at the earliest, c) This Hon’ble Court may kindly exempt the petitioner in producing the translated copy of Ext. P1 document, and d) such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.