IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
VASANTHY AGED 71 YEARS W/O.N.BHASKARAN NADAR – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR S/O.SUKUMARAN NADAR – Respondent
Sathish Ninan, J.
The original petition seeking to set aside Exts.A1 and A2 Sale Deeds, to declare the petitioners' title over the A schedule property and for recovery of gold ornaments, was dismissed by the Family Court. The petitioners are in the appeal.
2. The petitioners in the original petition are the parents of one late Bindu, who was married to the 1st respondent. The marriage was on 05.11.1990. Bindu committed suicide on 26.01.1997. In connection with the marriage, in respect of the A schedule property, Ext.A1 Sale Deed was executed by the parents of Bindu in favour of the 1st respondent. The conveyance was intended for the benefit of their daughter, Bindu. The 1st respondent, on 25.04.2008, conveyed the property under Ext.A2 Sale Deed in favour of the 2nd respondent. It is alleged that, during the subsistence of the marriage with Bindu, the 1st respondent contracted the second marriage, leading to the suicide of Bindu. The property belonged to Bindu and is to revert to the petitioners, it is contended.
3. It is also claimed that, at the time of marriage, the gold ornaments described in the petition B schedule were given to Bindu by the petitioners, and that the same has bee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.