SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4313

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
SHAJI SEBASTIAN – Appellant
Versus
JULIE JOSEPH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.P.RAMNATH, SHRI.P.RAJESH (KOTTAKKAL)
For the Respondents: SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN

P.Krishna Kumar, J.

This revision petition is filed against the order passed by the Family Court, Ernakulam in M.C. No.230/2006, directing the revision petitioner/husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month to the first respondent/wife and Rs.1,000/- per month to the second respondent/son.

2. During the course of hearing, both sides submitted that the first respondent/wife remarried on 08.02.2018 and that the second respondent/son attained majority on 20.12.2023. It was further submitted that, till May 2018, the revision petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month towards maintenance, in compliance with the interim direction of this Court. Both sides submitted that, in view of the above developments, the revision petition can be closed recording the said submissions.

3. After considering the submissions made by both sides, this revision petition is closed, recording the above facts. It is clarified that there shall be no recovery proceedings against each other under the above head.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top