SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
VIVEK V. – Appellant
Versus
MR. DEBAKANTA PADHI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.M.GEORGE, KUM.CHITHRA P.GEORGE, SRI.MATHEWS P. GEORGE
For the Respondents: SHRI.ASP.KURUP, SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP, SHRI.SIVA SURESH, SMT.B.SREEDEVI, SMT.ATHIRA VIJAYAN, SHRI.VYSHNAV S. NAIR, SMT.AKSHARA RAVI

JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to file afresh as and when the occasion arises.

The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top