SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
VIVEK V. – Appellant
Versus
MR. DEBAKANTA PADHI – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 65 OF 2026 | WA NO. 904 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.M.GEORGE, KUM.CHITHRA P.GEORGE, SRI.MATHEWS P. GEORGE
For the Respondents: SHRI.ASP.KURUP, SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP, SHRI.SIVA SURESH, SMT.B.SREEDEVI, SMT.ATHIRA VIJAYAN, SHRI.VYSHNAV S. NAIR, SMT.AKSHARA RAVI

The court permits withdrawal of a contempt petition with liberty to refile in future, emphasizing procedural adherence.

Headnote:The judgment relates to a contempt petition where the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to refile. The Court observed the accordance with procedural requirements and deemed the withdrawal appropriate without prejudice. Thus, the contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner.

JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to file afresh as and when the occasion arises.

The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon