Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
THE SECRETARY, KUNNAMKULAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.698, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR-680503 – Appellant
Versus
M.RADHAKRISHNAN (DECEASED), S/O. RAGHAVA MENON, PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, THOLOOR, THRISSUR – Respondent
WA NO. 1081 OF 2021 | WP(C) NO.4404 OF 2014

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.C. SASIDHARAN
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S. SWATHI KUMAR, SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN, SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI

The court recognizes the resolution of a dispute between parties, leading to the disposal of the writ appeal without further proceedings.

Headnote:In accordance with the amicable resolution between the parties, the Court finds that no further adjudication is required in the matter, thus disposing of the writ appeal. The dispute originally addressed in WA NO. 1081 OF 2021 and WP

(C) NO.4404 OF 2014 is concluded based on the settlement terms outlined by the appellant. Consequently, the outcome is that the appeal is determined resolved without further legal proceedings.

JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J An affidavit has been filed by the appellant stating that the dispute in question has been resolved amicably between the parties and that nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ appeal.

Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :